Archive for the ‘Writing’ Category

Writing for a New Audience

Friday, September 29th, 2006

A brand new blog means a brand new audience. You may hope that you will draw your customers as your readers, but who knows who will come to read your prose? You may draw a new potential customer, someone who has just discovered you and your organization, someone who could be an influencer, a customer evangelist, taking what you to say to many more potential customers leading your enterprise to exponential growth.

Just the idea of not knowing who is reading can be an overwhelming state for some writers. How to decide on simple things such as writing voice and style can become looming questions. I suggest that as the blogger, you make a choice that your reader will be an intelligent person who doesn’t knowthe information, a single most important reader, who is very much like yourself.

To make the audience take form as a person, which will make the writing easier and stronger, ask yourself these questions;

  • Who am I writing for?
  • How is this reader like me and how is this reader not?
  • Why does this reader read blogs like mine?

One helpful thing to do is to sketch a written profile of the person who might be the average reader, that single most important reader that you will be writing for. Then with that reader in mind, you can write with confidence and care, in a conversational tone of voice, choosing words and phrasing that is appropriate for that reader to understand the content as well as to get a sense of who you, the blogger, really are.

Liz Strauss

Offering Readers a Chance to Talk

Thursday, May 18th, 2006

I was just answering two comments on the post Pay Attention. No, I Mean Really. Doing that left me thinking of something blogging has taught me a lot about — not just the beauty of paying attention to one thing at a time — but the fulfillment of offering readers a chance to talk.

When I first started blogging, I often tried to do too much. I’d write a post that carried the load of too many thoughts at one time. Those blogging posts went both deep and wide. They were so complete, I left no room for readers to add their thoughts.

It’s not a conversation when all a reader can say is I agree with you, Great post. or You covered that subject really well. There’s just nowhere for a conversation to go, if I don’t leave room for a reader’s thoughts to squeeze in between my own. Now I know to think about the conversation when I write.

Here are a few things that I do differently now.

  • I ask more questions without answering them.
  • I don’t try to think through every possibility as I once used to do.
  • I’ve backed off on holding myself accountable as an expert on the what I write about and instead, think of myself as one of the audience talking to another reader about an idea, waiting to hear his or her point of view.

Right now I’m wondering what you’re thinking about most blog posts. What is the thing that pulls you out? What changes you into a person who writes a comment, who wants to add to the discussion, who feels your thoughts are important, will be valued, and will be heard?

Those are questions I think about when I blog . . . only readers can answer them.

Liz Strauss

How to Tell People Who Won’t Be Told?

Saturday, April 22nd, 2006

I do well at ghost writing and at acting because I have room for many points of view. I can stretch my head around a variety of scenarios and motivations. That same trait, skill set — choose the label, it doesn’t matter — makes me unable to invest heavily in political causes. I’m the consummate centrist. Could be the archetype.

I have a tendency to balance folks who have a cause, by seeing the other side of their argument. I don’t argue with them. I want to understand their points, but as they talk I also hear the falacies in what they’re saying–whether I choose to give voice to them or not.

Knowing this about myself, I rarely share less than the most important of my own ideas. I find few things worth debating or arguing over. I like to meet in the center, where we agree. Most things in life don’t really matter nearly as much as people act like they do.

That being said . . . I took that approach to the Internet. I sure didn’t want to listen to folks promising tales of doom. Hey, folks have been promising tales of doom for as long as there have been folks. Then Brian Clark, a friend and a man I respect, asked me to read something written by Doc Searls. I did. I wrote about it in a piece called Saving the Net–Doc Searls & Walter Cronkite.

I began that piece talking about the media hype around y2K and ended that piece saying

I think that I might have found the person I can believe.
Doc Searls is my Walter Cronkite.

I still feel that way.

Yesterday on his personal weblog, Doc again pointed out that people are running ads and making rules that will affect all of us. They are people who own media, telephone, and cable companies–people who own the pipes over which the bits and bytes that you’re reading right now are traveling.

Doc says it all in so few words.

. . . ads are influencing Congress and governments around the World as they write the rules that will shape the future of the Internet and communications. . . .

where is the voice and message of the Internet community — the Internet innovators, entrepreneurs and enthusiasts — in this world-changing discussion? . . .

If we do not participate in the debate, if we do not transform the messaging, the rules will not be written with our best interests at heart.

He’s announcing Jeff Pulver’s Viral Marketing Contest and now so am I. Here are the contest rules.

If you read the piece I wrote called Doc Searls and Walter Cronkite, you’ll know why this is important. If you don’t have time, I understand. For the longest time, neither did I.

But would you have time to pass this on?

Liz Strauss